wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: small versions blurred?
Bernhard Vogl 2005-Jun-30 08:11:00
Can anyone point me to a good example of a "blurry small version"?
All i can find are versions where both versions (small and large) are not
too sharp but none like Erik told.
I can remember a suggestion by Hans Nyberg who prefers higer resolution with
high compression against lower resolution with larger file size.
I'm also working with PanoCube and Windows and i don't feel that my small
versions look more blurry than the larger version(?).
Best regards
Bernhard
> --- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "Victor" <#removed#>
> An: #removed#
> Betreff: Re: small versions blurred?
> Datum: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:48:11 -0000
>
> Fulvio,
>
> I'll second that. I've bemoaned the fact that I can have a
> wonderfully sharp original image, and it looks great with PTViewer and
> the like, but try as I might I haven't found a way to transfer that
> sharpness into a QTVR using windows. I'm using PanoCube, but if
> there's something better (short of buying a mac) I'd love to hear
> about it.
>
> Victor
>
> --- In #removed#, Fulvio Senore <#removed#> wrote:
> > It happens that, using Windows tools, I have never been able to
> create a
> > decent small pano. They are always blurred, while the larger ones are
> > sharp. The original images are sharp, so it seems that the file has
> been
> > blurred in the conversion.
> >
> > It seems that you need a Mac to create a good QTVR file...
> >
> > Fulvio Senore