World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:mark1schuster
Date/Time:2005-Jan-21 23:33:00
Subject:What is VR going to be called by the General Public.

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: What is VR going to be called by the General Public. mark1schuster 2005-Jan-21 23:33:00
I've been following the discussion about what to call ? well until 
we find something better to call it ? VR with interest.

I'm a novice panographer and I am astounded by the quality and 
technical excellence of Group members work.  Their images are 
fascinating and I can spend hours viewing them, but one thing they 
ain't is "virtual reality".  No more is a Constable or Turner 
landscape hanging in the National Gallery.  I am therefore not a 
detractor when I object to calling them VR..

So what is "virtual reality"?  Something that gives the impression 
of experiencing an actual event, even though the event is a fiction 
or recording.  I'll give an example.  As a child I was taken to the 
cinema to see a "3D" movie.  Wearing red and green glasses, sitting 
in the front row, I was taken on a virtual roller coaster ride. A 
white knuckle ride and the screams as we dived towards the ground 
weren't virtual.  They were real.  It was truly scary.  It was 
truly "virtual reality".  The impression was that I was actually 
there, riding the Big Dipper.
Compare that with viewing a panorama on a flat screen armed with a 
mouse and tell me honestly if that is virtual reality in reality.

Daz said it washed whiter than white.  It was a catchy selling 
point, but a nonsense, nonetheless.  A catch phrase just like Quick 
Time's VR.  Through usage it is becoming ? maybe has become ? 
acceptable.  But this doesn't make it right, and perhaps this group 
with its world wide influence can put things right.

No Landis, it's not "immersive  photography", but you have already 
dismissed that one.

Since we guide the panorama around the screen with a mouse, what 
about "steerable panography" 

Perhaps "steerable panorama" wouldn't be all that bad a name.

As to descriptions for different degrees of projection, what 
about "full spherical panorama", "full circular panorama" 
and "partial panorama"?  But Landis, not "panoramic".  That's an 
adjective. (Yes I know that many spherical panoramas are actually 
projected onto the inside of a cube, but to the viewer, they are 
spherical).

I'm sure many of you have as good, or better suggestions, but let us 
drop VR.



Mark

PS - Is panographer a general term, or did I just make it up.  
msWord checker doesn't recognize it, but I won't tell you what it 
offers as an alternative.  Could land us all in jail.









Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page