World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:espressotamper
Date/Time:2005-Jun-25 15:49:00
Subject:Fisheye vs. Rectilinear High Resolution follow up

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Fisheye vs. Rectilinear High Resolution follow up espressotamper 2005-Jun-25 15:49:00
Robert & Tom,
I use the 10.5mm and am very happy with it. Are these high resolution panos - 

"16K px by 8K px. The panos I shoot with my 10.5mm are 8450 x 4225px."

for printing? I'm sure that must be the point of that size. Almost all of my pano delivery is 
on the web so it must load quickly and I rarely require anything over 1200x600 unless it is 
a full screen. Having not printed panos in a large format yet, could you provide a very brief 
description of the file size and print size you like. So that I am not off topic, describe what 
you would do to use a high resolution pano about water : )

Thanks,
Scott Stillman
http://www.vrdigital.com/

P.S. Hello to everybody! I think this my very first post after being a member of the group 
for months. What took so long for me to post? I really enjoy the group.



Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page