wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Enquiry: PTGUI or Panoweaver 4.0?
Sven Hafner 2005-May-31 10:27:00
Hi !
I didnt upgrade tp PW4.0 because of the price tag. I still use it
(3.01) for "fast" previewing; after a field trip I run all images (JPG
preview from 1Ds) through PW (each set 2min) to get an idea how it
will look like and decide which one will go to the final
production(with RAW converted using same color temp) in
PTMAC.
Depending on the light conditions,..floors,.. it take me between 20min
and 1 hour to produce a final QTVR including floor cleaning,
enblend,..
cheers
Sven
--- In #removed#, larry lau <#removed#> wrote:
> Thanks, Luca,
>
> I've been struggling with PTgui for several days and it works great.
The only problem is that it takes too much time(around 2 hours) to
make one pano. Maybe I'm too beef-witted :( How much time will it
cost you to finish one stitching generally?
>
> Luca Vascon <#removed#> wrote:
> For me PTGUI is the best one.
> Panoweaver is a derivative work from PanoTools, so it is a really
powerful
> engine you can never completely use.
> Like to have a field camera with an idiotproof entry-level slr
interface,
> wit no dials, buttons only and the icons with flower, mountains etc.
> It is less difficult to learn how it really works than to relay on
prebuilt
> workflows.
> Of course, more satisfating, more professional, it gives you more
> possibilities and control.
> :-)
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]