wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Panoramic Image Exposure Blending
Matt 2006-Oct-16 21:43:00
Sacha,
Thanks again for your help.
At this point should purchase PTGui and ditch Panoweaver while also
using the download from enblend?
I'll do some research on the vignette on the .jpg
Thanks again for the help, I'll have to come down from Charlotte and buy
you a cold one.
Matt
--- In #removed#, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> You need to graduate to a professional base panotools frontend.
>
> 1. Its quicker and easier when you know everything. I stitched your
> images in under 5 minutes.
> 2. It's easier to do everything the correct way. Accurate distortions,
> and projections etc
> 3. It handles blending programs seamlessly. There's nothing to be
> afraid of.
> 4. You won't have obvious zenith and nadirs anymore even with accurate
> exposure locks like I see in your wwp.
>
> The blending programs eliminate the need for advanced masking
techniques to
> set a believable transition.
>
> You can adjust vignette for jpgs with cs2 and there are other programs
that
> slip my mind.
>
>
>
> Sacha Griffin
> Southern Digital Solutions LLC
> www.southern-digital.com
> www.seeit360.net
> www.ezphotosafe.com
> 404-551-4275
> 404-731-7798
>
> _____
>
> From: Matt [mailto:crazycraces@...]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 4:33 PM
> To: #removed#
> Subject: Re: Panoramic Image Exposure Blending
>
>
>
> Sacha,
> Thank you for taking time to load and stitch my pano.
>
> Couple of questions for you if you don't mind.
> 1. Can I adjust vignette with out it being RAW, if so where do I
> find this?
> 2. I am using Panoweaver 4 to stitch, I noticed where the black car
> is on yours is a perfect stitch. I have not been able to achieve
> this as yet with Panoweaver 4.
> 3. I read a little bit about enblend and kind of scared me off by
> using a "DOS" like setting. Are these fears I should overlook and
> try enblend? or is it a complicated program? Only been computing for
> around 6 years, no DOS back ground at all.
>
> Thanks again to you and Uri both for the guidance and suggestions.
> Matt
> --- In #removed# <mailto:wwp%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Sacha
Griffin"
> sachagriffin@ wrote:
> >
> > White balance has nothing to do with your issues.
> >
> >
> >
> > You probably need to correct your vignette and most importantly use
> a
> > stitcher with a blender.
> >
> > PTGUI's built in blender, or enblend, or smartblend.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sacha Griffin
> > Southern Digital Solutions LLC
> > www.southern-digital.com
> > www.seeit360.net
> > www.ezphotosafe.com
> > 404-551-4275
> > 404-731-7798
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Matt [mailto:crazycraces@]
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:07 PM
> > To: #removed# <mailto:wwp%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > Subject: Panoramic Image Exposure Blending
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Greetings pano makers,
> >
> > I joined this group a few weeks ago for the WWP "Transportation
> Theme".
> > While my Bird House <http://www.360virtu
> > <http://www.360virtu
<http://www.360virtuals.com/birdhouse/small_bh.htm>
> als.com/birdhouse/small_bh.htm>
> > als.com/birdhouse/small_bh.htm>
> > pano came out decent enough, I am still learning and need some
> guidance.
> >
> > The issue where I need help is this; I shot this pano nearly a year
> ago
> > in .jpg format with auto white balance. I have corrected these
> issues
> > and shoot only RAW format with custom WB now. However, I still have
> > this pano that I would like to use. I have played with things like
> > Brightness/Contrast, Match Color, et. in PSCS2. I am at best an
> > intermediate user in PSCS2. Could a few of you old pros guide me
> along
> > on how to correct the exposure problems I am having.
> >
> > Thunder MT <http://www.360virtu
> > <http://www.360virtu
> <http://www.360virtuals.com/thunder_mt/thunder_mt.htm>
> als.com/thunder_mt/thunder_mt.htm>
> > als.com/thunder_mt/thunder_mt.htm> . is
> > located right on the Blue Ridge Parkway of North Carolina. Thanks
> for
> > any help and guidance with this issue.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>