wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: March 2005 WWP topic: ecology
Robert Thien 2005-Jan-07 13:21:00
Good point Ray. No, it does no have to be disturbing.
Why is it every time we talk about the environment, ecology etc.. it
seems to lead us down a path of things destroyed, devastation, and so
on. I look out my window all day and see the trees, grass, bugs,
birds, other animals, people, sky, clouds, rain, snow (sometimes) and
so one and know the world is ever changing. The worlds ecological
development is far beyond my years spent on earth.
Robert.
On Jan 7, 2005, at 4:11 AM, Uri cogan wrote:
>
> >Does it have to be disturbing?
> >
> >Ray Broussard
>
>
> Not necessarily, but... We can celebrate our relationship with the
> rest of nature and yet be intensely aware of, and expose the
> incredible harm that is done by some human activities.
>
> Where I live I can choose any time to take photos of the fantastic
> beauty of what's left of the old-growth rain-forest, but how can I
> ignore, or avoid the horrific devastation of nearby clear-cut
> valleys? I guess I'll want to take photos of both.
>
> And, I wouldn't exclude photos of natural disasters either; that's a
> part of the "ecology" as well.
> --
>
> ???????????? Uri Cogan
>
> ??? http://www.uricogan.com
> ***?? My Karma Ran Over My Dogma?? ***
> ?????? http://www.ecopsychology.org
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------
> The World-Wide Panorama
>
> For more information:
> -Visit the web site at http://GeoImages.Berkeley.edu/wwp.html
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> ? To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wwp/
> ?
> ? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> #removed#
> ?
> ? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>