World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:caroling
Date/Time:2005-Jul-02 13:21:00
Subject:Re: sizes [was - small versions blurred?]

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Re: sizes [was - small versions blurred?] caroling 2005-Jul-02 13:21:00
Prep server has gone berzerk. We used to say Berzerkley.
It is discouraging to get a small pano down below 500KB and have the all clear last night,
then to check one last time today and now find that both panos, previously within limits now are 
blinking offenders.
Sorry folks. I'm out of here. I will not further comply.
I realize it probably is just a cruel software error. You don't really mean to apply panorama size torture 
do you? It could be a new twist on the old water torture tactics.
In magma, Caroling


> On 2 Jul 2005 at 5:35, G. Donald Bain wrote:
> 
> > The size limits have remained the same since the first announcement of 
> > the WWP, back in February 2004. The only change has been to bring 
> > excessive file sizes to your attention.
> 
> By the way: The server doesn't calculate right: I just uploaded a 
> 1804008 byte version of the large one and it says: 'Fullscreeen QTVR 
> file size exceeds recommendation by 20 %' As for my calculation this 
> 0.2% above recommendation...
> -- 
> Erik Krause

Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page