World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:olivier satnet
Date/Time:2008-Jan-08 05:27:00
Subject:Re: 28mm PC ..... 85mm f/2.8D PC Micro Nikkor

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Re: 28mm PC ..... 85mm f/2.8D PC Micro Nikkor olivier satnet 2008-Jan-08 05:27:00
Hi roger ... what is your private mail, 
so we can talk off line and i can send you somes Panos i do with my voyageur ....
Gildas is a good friend .... 

olivier . 


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Roger D. Williams 
  To: #removed# 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 12:18 AM
  Subject: Re: 28mm PC ..... 85mm f/2.8D PC Micro Nikkor


  Dear Olivier,

  How nice to hear from you. My own rotary camera was also made by Gildas!
  Voyageur, of course... Excellent constructions and not too difficult to
  use. I love the remote control!

  I use the Epson film scanner for the 19cm long negatives. How do you scan
  them?

  Roger W.

  On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:38:53 +0900, olivier satnet 
  <#removed#> wrote:

  > Hi roger .... completely OK with you ,
  > i use it too with my "voyageur" proto of gildas Lelostec ....a friend 
  > who build cameras ...
  > very good image is gived in 360 images on 220 film with PC lenses ....
  >
  > Bests, Olivier .
  >
  >
  >
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: Roger D. Williams
  > To: #removed#
  > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 8:51 PM
  > Subject: Re: 85mm f/2.8D PC Micro Nikkor
  >
  >
  > On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:13:58 +0900, Hans Nyberg <#removed#> 
  > wrote:
  >
  > > On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Aykut Erdogdu wrote:
  > >
  > >> Has anyone tested 85mm f/2.8D PC Micro Nikkor? Can we use this
  > >> lens' ability to shift in order to stitch our panoramas like Noblex?
  > >
  > > Short answer NO.
  > > Shift is a bad idea for panoramas.
  >
  > Well, it's a bad idea for STITCHED panoramas, but ideal for ROTARY
  > cameras. I use a 28mm Nikkor on my 120 film rotary camera, and I
  > think the 85mm focal length would limit this lens's usefulness in
  > most panorama applications used (unlike me) with standard 35mm film.
  > The shift function would allow useless floor images to be replaced
  > with the more interesting higher features of the objects in view.
  > The one thing you can't do with cylindrical panoramas is point the
  > camera up. The corrections are very difficult to perform and result
  > in most cases in too much loss if the image when trimming it to
  > rectangular format.
  >
  > I can imagine the 85mm lens producing a nice panorama of a rim of
  > mountains... <g>
  >
  > Roger W.
  >
  > --
  > Work: www.adex-japan.com
  > Play: www.usefilm.com/member/roger
  >
  >
  >
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >
  >
  >
  > ------
  > The World-Wide Panorama
  >
  > For more information:
  > -Visit the web site at http://GeoImages.Berkeley.edu/wwp.html
  > Yahoo! Groups Links
  >
  >
  >

  -- 
  Work: www.adex-japan.com
  Play: www.usefilm.com/member/roger


   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page