wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Don's essay on ELEVATION
caroling 2008-Jun-10 15:37:00
Mine were shot in landscape and do not overlap. What I'm thinking now is that
the radius differed, since the perimeter was a square. The four middle shots
were closer to the center and the four corner shots were farther away. Also, the
shots were hand held, no tripod, and probably were not perfectly perpendicular
to the radius to the center of the building, especially at the corners. Also I
didn't keep the horizon in the middle. Not much control there. Wish I could go
back and try it again, but that's not possible. I will try it now with another
circle to verify the 17%. That sounds great.
--
Caroling, www.wholeo.net
---------------------- Original Message: ---------------------
From: "Victor" <#removed#>
To: #removed#
Subject: Re: Don's essay on ELEVATION
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:01:03 +0000
> Caroling,
>
> Perhaps his images were shot in landscape orientation? On a a full
> frame setup with a 35mm lens, 8 images would provide about 17% overlap
> per shot. However, with slightly less than 38? HFOV in portrait mode,
> you need 10 shots to just barely cover the horizon and even then,
> you'll only get about 5% overlap.
>
>