World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:Alex Makienko
Date/Time:2009-May-11 02:37:00
Subject:Re: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ?

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Re: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ? Alex Makienko 2009-May-11 02:37:00
Hans,

The spots in the image you refer have absolutely the same nature as here:

http://dimensions360.com/index.php?screen=show&id=7087d155&galle...

This pano has been taken under an intensive shower - dense water dust was coming from the powerful waterfall (yes, the lens had been thoroughly cleaned before and, of course, after shoting :-)). What you see there is IMAGES of waterdrops on the front lens of Nikkor.

Here:

http://dimensions360.com/index.php?screen=show&id=e222c0bc&galle...

the nature of the spot is completely different. This is one of my worst panos and a pure example of Nikkor's FLARE.

Cheers,
Alex



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Hans Nyberg 
  To: #removed# 
  Sent: May 10, 2009 8:54 PM
  Subject: Re: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ?






  On 11/05/2009, at 2.00, Alex Makienko wrote:

  > C'mon! Do you think I'm a rookie? ;-) Please be sure that having 30 
  > + years in serious photography (including professionsl one) and 
  > being MS in physics (you probably know that optics is the part of 
  > physics) I know how to keep lens clean.
  >
  > For your information: Flares shaped like spots, polygons and 
  > somethong like that are NEVER caused by grease, fingerprints, 
  > scratches etc. These defects cause parasitic beams, star-like 
  > spots, additional lighting and anything else BUT spots and flares. 
  > I hope I do not need to refer to a fundamental optics to confirm 
  > that. Please just trust my experience in physics (and optics 
  > particulary) and photography.

  Sorry Alex but I beat you. I have 56 years experience in photography 
  of which 42 is as a professional photographer,

  Of course you get flares with poligons because of a lens which is 
  not cleaned.
  Here is an example taken a couple of years ago.
  http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/flare/dust.jpg

  This is the Canon 15mm one the best fisheye you can get. It has 
  practically no flare very little CA very little lightfall and 
  sharpness is exellent.
  However I took my brand new lens and went out to test it without even 
  taking the lens cap of and look at the frontlens.

  I did not think of that it had to be cleaned before I used it, and 
  on top of that I also by mistake on my new 5D stopped down to F19 
  which accelerated the problem.

  I see this a lot on panos made even by very experienced 
  photographers. And people complain that the lens has flares but in 
  reality it is just a dirty lens stopped down to 16 or even 22.

  Hans

  Hans Nyberg
  Panoramas.dk<http://www.panoramas.dk>
  Features Fullscreen Panoramas from the best VR Photographers in the 
  World
  email: #removed#

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.24/2107 - Release Date: 05/10/09 07:02:00


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page