wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Help with WWP entry choice
Victor 2004-Mar-26 05:03:00
Third one would be my choice as I agree with the comments others
have made that the second one is "off" as far as colors.
I don't think it's that "drab" ... and it looks nice. I'm being
driven to distraction trying to get my shot into QTVR form. It
looks very good as a stitched cylindrical, but the only tool I've
been able to find to use (for windows, for free) has been PanoCube.
Mind you, I'm able to create a QTVR, but in order to have the
quality appear anything like the original stitched image, I'm ending
up with files approaching 4Mb in size. Under 2Mb the image starts
to look lifeless and poorly detailed.
While I've fooled around with pans for years, I've only recently
started to get serious with trying to put them into QTVR form. I
usually do partials for print purposes. But I digress ....
If I may ask, what did you use to create the QTVR? And what size
file was the original? I'm a bit dissapointed by the results I'm
getting as compared to many of the files I've seen here and
elsewhere.
Thanks in advance ...
Victor