World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:Edward Fink
Date/Time:2004-Oct-06 01:45:00
Subject:RE: MultiMap More or Less

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: RE: MultiMap More or Less Edward Fink 2004-Oct-06 01:45:00
Personally, I think if you?re dealing with someone who is upset that their
?secure, undisclosed location? might be made public, then it might not be a
good idea to take 360 degree photographs of that location and publish them
on the World Wide Web, whether you fudge on the exact location or not.

They already seem to be expressing an extraordinary concern for their
privacy ? if not outright paranoia :) - so how much longer until they freak
out over it and ask that the panorama be removed?


Ed


-----Original Message-----
From: Tudor Jenkins [mailto:#removed#] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 5:12 PM
To: #removed#
Subject: Re: MultiMap More or Less

Hi,

Normally not a problem, just this time I would prefer not to have a link to
multimap with the coordinates that I gave. This has been suggested AFTER we
submitted our details.

I would be happy with the multimap link if my coordinates are changed to
eliminate seconds. (If Landis can be bothered to do this!)

I know this looks a bit silly to 95% of you - I'm sorry.


Cheers

Tudor
? ----- Original Message ----- 
? From: Harald Walker 
? To: #removed# 
? Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:55 PM
? Subject: Re: MultiMap More or Less


? Charles Carstensen wrote:

? >Dave, you may have hit on the compromise solution. Making the seconds 0 
? >would indicate you do not want more accuracy published. I would submit 
? >the lack of accuracy uniformily gives more protection to both the 
? >photographer, and the WWP, et.al., against some sneaky/freaky claim of 
? >privacy invasion or some far out theory of liability/trespass. 
? >
? I really don't understand the problem any longer. If you don't want to 
? publish the precise position of your panorama for privacy or other 
? reasons, then just don't do it. Most panorama's here have been taken at 
? normal public places and I think it is a very valuable feature for 
? visitors to get the exact coordinates, e.g. to visit a location
personally.

? >Do we really care if the 7-15 foot accuracy is actually 
? >published?
? >? 
? >
? Depends on the subject/object. Most of the bridges are probably easy to 
? find without :-)

? Regards,

? Harald



? ------
? The World-Wide Panorama

? For more information:
? -Visit the web site at http://GeoImages.Berkeley.edu/wwp.html 


??????? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
????????????? ADVERTISEMENT
???????????? 
?????? 
?????? 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
? Yahoo! Groups Links

??? a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
??? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wwp/
????? 
??? b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
??? #removed#
????? 
??? c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------
The World-Wide Panorama

For more information:
-Visit the web site at http://GeoImages.Berkeley.edu/wwp.html 



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





Yahoo! Groups Links
? To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wwp/
? 
? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
#removed#
? 
? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page