wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ?
Alex Makienko 2009-May-11 02:09:00
Hi Bo,
Good idea! I usually use just my hand to mask the sun. :-)
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: Bo Lorentzen
To: #removed#
Sent: May 10, 2009 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ?
Alex,
I have a CD disk mounted on a mechanics mirror, telescoping to about 1m.
fits in the back of the camera bag and create a perfect small block for the
sun shot, always do two frames of straight sun, then combine in photoshop.
Bo
From: #removed# [mailto:#removed#] On Behalf Of Alex
Makienko
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:48 PM
To: #removed#
Subject: Re: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ?
Sacha,
In my experience the way you suggest works in limited cases when sun is not
too bright. Otherwise Nikkor adds some lighting to all the frame area
(probably because of internal reflections). Unfortunately it may distort the
brightness balance of the frame containing sun and will cause some quality
losses in stitching. I think in this case it is better to mask sun while
shooting the second frame without moving a camera. One more advantage of
this way is that you may easily combine two layers in FS before stitching -
it gives you more control over image.
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: Sacha Griffin
To: #removed# <mailto:wwp%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: May 10, 2009 7:28 PM
Subject: RE: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ?
Flare is compensated for, simply by panning 20 degrees.
This results in the flare occupying a different area.
Sacha Griffin
Southern Digital Solutions LLC
http://www.southern-digital.com
http://www.seeit360.net
GMAIL IM: #removed# <mailto:sachagriffin007%40gmail.com>
404-551-4275
From: #removed# <mailto:wwp%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:#removed# <mailto:wwp%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
Luis
Benitez
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:23 PM
To: #removed# <mailto:wwp%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: Nikon 2.8/10,5 Sigma 3.5/8 or Tokina 10-17 ?
On 10/5/09 03:39 PM, "Alex Makienko" <#removed#
<mailto:alex.m%40dimensions360.com>
<mailto:alex.m%40dimensions360.com> > wrote:
> Francois,
>
> I use Nikkor 2.8/10.5 for 5 years. My personal opinion - good lens for
> interior panos but not the best for landscape ones. While shooting panos
with
> low sun you have to do a second shot with "masked" sun otherwise you may
get a
> huge yellow-blue flare almost in the center of the frame which is almost
> impossible to remove. Shooting with a rear filter may increase flares
> dramatically even in an interior - rear lens surface is almost flat so any
> reflection "jumps" many times between lens and rear filter until it comes
out
> of sight, so you'll have a lot of fun editing flares in FS. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Alex Makienko
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
----------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.24/2107 - Release Date: 05/10/09
07:02:00
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.24/2107 - Release Date: 05/10/09 07:02:00
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]