wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Evidence in a court of Law - are "stitched" panoramas admissible?
northwest_omnipresence 2010-Nov-10 21:04:00
Just curious if anyone has had the opportunity to be called upon to present a stitched panoramic image as evidence in any level of the legal system?
Is there a defense against their use - ie: the stitching process is sequential and the stitching algorithms may miss elements from the actual scene.
Are there any tests or examples that can show that a stitched panoramic image need not be considered a "doctored" document?