World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:bruce_hemming
Date/Time:2005-Jul-13 08:15:00
Subject:MPEG4 v JPEG compression

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: MPEG4 v JPEG compression bruce_hemming 2005-Jul-13 08:15:00
Having been admonished by the wagging finger on the prep server over the size of my 
submission I did a little experiment with the following results.  Compressed at 51% with 
JPEG = 2.7 meg file, compressed at 51% with MPEG4 = 1.9 meg file.

Quality looked identical to me - any pano gurus care to comment on which codec gives 
best results? Out of all available that is - not just the two that I have used as examples.

Could save some wrist slapping next time around.

Best

Bruce



Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page