wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: MPEG4 v JPEG compression
Landis 2005-Jul-13 20:17:00
>I'm staying away from anything else than jpeg now,
>because the results are not so good and unpredictible
>when you look at it closely also sorenson or mp4 are much
>more processor intensive and were meant for video.
What - no Cinepak? ;)
I agree, Photo-JPEG is really the way to go. It's the most
compatible with older versions of QuickTime as well as the conversion
utilities for PTViewer and SPi-V. And it gives great results.
-Landis