World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:Richard Crowest
Date/Time:2005-Jul-16 18:14:00
Subject:Press and publicity... and no competitions please.

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Press and publicity... and no competitions please. Richard Crowest 2005-Jul-16 18:14:00
Just a couple of quick thoughts in response to recent messages.

I ran a Google search on my name about a week ago (not an ego-trip,
honest! I was 
checking for some out-of-date web pages that were still on a former
ISP's server...). It was 
less than a week after the Water event (the first one in which I'd
taken part) was launched, 
and the WWP photographer page and pano page were already the
highest-ranked items 
(out of more than 70). Is someone at Berkeley sleeping with Google's
CEO, or does the web 
just really like this project?!

One quick thought about the links to the translated versions of the
home page (and the 
multilingual press releases) - shouldn't the language names be
written in their native form 
(i.e. Deutsch rather than German, etc.)?

Finally, my two pennies' worth about ranking and competition - I'd
just like to back Landis 
with a very firm "no thank you". I'm sorry if some people find
exploring the work on offer 
to be boring and a waste of time, but I think a participatory event
like this one depends on 
everyone being given equal exposure (even if the randomiser does seem
to favour Mr. 
Bennett!). The likelihood of any given pano being given a high rating
by visitors to the site 
depends on a lot more than the skill of the photographer and the
amount of time and 
effort they expend on their contribution. The accessibility of
photogenic locations that are 
applicable to the theme, the vagaries of the weather conditions at
the time, and the 
contributor's ability to afford equipment and software all play a
major part. I don't think 
any of these factors should prevent someone from getting their work
to a wide audience.

What might perhaps help people to find panos they'd find interesting
would be the 
introduction of some sort of keyword system to the site (I'm sure
Markus could cope with 
this, judging by the miracles he's performed so far...). That way, if
people were looking for 
something a bit spectacular in the most recent event, for example,
they could search for 
"waterfall" or "rapids" or something like that. Just a thought - but
please, no voting, 
rankings or competition. That's too much like real life...

Richard




Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page