wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Holly WAR?! :D
johncharlesriley 2008-Jun-27 17:24:00
Wow, Josh... it is hard to know just how to respond to this tirade. Could you point us to
your work? Just something to let us know that you are a genuine person and not a pawn
of ZKM? I mean, are you able to document that you are a photographer (amateur or pro)
in the USA or South America or Australia, or whatever? I just have trouble believing that
you aren't associated with ZKM somehow. It would be easier to imagine trying to have a
dialogue with you if I (we) were certain of whom we were talking to.
John
--- In #removed#, "Josh" <wwp@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hurray - here they are again, the narrow-minded* who forgot to take the blinkers off.
You
> talk about artwork and you want to be artists? The way you talk reveals that you haven't
> even caught a glimpse of arts. Meanwhile I hope there will never be a collaboration
> between you and ZKM because you don't deserve it. You have NO IDEA, what immense
> development has been done by the people at ZKM. Compared to such creative genius
you
> are just pathetic bourgeois with dollar-signs in your eyes. You have not the brains to
> understand the meaning of 'net culture' because you are not cultured.
>
> Too harsh words for you? I am smirking. I am just talking to you in the same way you
talk
> to someone you haven't met personally. I believe you wouldn't dare to talk like this while
> sitting at the same table in one room - or if so, you are the ones who have sunken low
...
> Thats one of the bad things about open internet, groups and boards: every twit can type
> shit on his keyboard.
>
> You are using words like theft and stealing, yes even 'holly war' (you ment holy I guess)
-
> ridiculous! Tell us - what has been stolen from you, what is gone forever, what has been
> damaged? Go on and specify the damage! That's in fact what you must do before writing
> an invoice or even going to court - otherwise the judge might just laugh at you.
>
> You are talking about commercial use. Go on you materialistic professionals - calculate
> the chance of a mass production of such a pano-screen. Name a global investor who
> would spend a cent!? Every public institution receives monetary support from the state
or
> from companies - but not solely for commercial purposes. Quite a lot of developments
are
> done for the sake of science and research, to bring knowledge and experience to higher
> levels by not only looking at the profit!
>
> There has been no damage neither to you or your work nor to third parties. PROOF only
> one case, where you have received the right to publish on WWP, but NOT somewhere
else?!
> If it is published on WWP, it can easily be seen on Google Earth (by FREE downloading
the
> placemarks) - what can be more public? You have no control at all, where and when
your
> panos are seen. A rights-contract about that is futile.
>
> You are the ones who take 'different measurements', you compare apples and oranges.
> You should look at the 'real thing', i.e. what has happened effectively, then go on with
> your work and save your families from starving, you paupers.
>
> Now I feel better - I had to vent my anger about your inadequate aggressive behavior ...
> And hey dorks, read your own words, they don't solve any problem, they are just a
> squandering of bandwidth. :p
>
>
> (* Of course I do not mean the whole WWP group! But I am too chicken-hearted to name
> the handful - the right ones will know by discovering quotations)
>