wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Holly WAR?! :D
Thomas 2008-Jun-27 19:50:00
Well as you meant me for the commercial use as you seems not to have
the balls to say names(Says a lot about your Character in real life)
Why is a global investor needed? For a computer, some beamer and a big
screen?
You like buzz words it seems.
The MPI T?bingen has stated that they want to buy one for scientifical
presentation and more will follow than.(Here you have a potential
customer) It seem you have no clue how much money is out there for
such stuff. Why is there a mass production needed? No one was talking
about mass production! Electron microscopes are also not in mass
production but the companies are earning money through it. But it
seems on the world of Media Markt or Saturn is in your imagination,
you should open the eyes a bit!
Meanwhile 2 Globoramas are build or in production, or how will they
show it on 2 places parallel his coming fall? Can not be that
expensive than or what is your opinion?
The Laser pointer an integral part of the Globorama is in talks for
mass production.
No Commercial interests?
Why has Dataphonic quickly removed everything about the Globorama
where they have clearly offered it? After the ZKM lawyer is riding on
the non commercial interest horse?
No Commercial interests? From a company directly related to the ZKM?
They are feeding their children with air?
I think the real problem is that the ZKM is not even been able to say
just sorry. They are talking to us via a Lawyer and brought all up to
a total different level. That is what the people makes upset.
And to call people here with names shows just how deep you are sunken
as no one has called Mr. Weibel or Lintermann names.
And last but not least I do not want to see your reaction when one is
"loaning" your pictures and showing it elswhere.
Also can you explain me how a nonmaterialistic professional can make a
living? :p
Am 27.06.2008 um 19:12 schrieb Josh:
>
> Hurray - here they are again, the narrow-minded* who forgot to take
> the blinkers off. You
> talk about artwork and you want to be artists? The way you talk
> reveals that you haven't
> even caught a glimpse of arts. Meanwhile I hope there will never be
> a collaboration
> between you and ZKM because you don't deserve it. You have NO IDEA,
> what immense
> development has been done by the people at ZKM. Compared to such
> creative genius you
> are just pathetic bourgeois with dollar-signs in your eyes. You have
> not the brains to
> understand the meaning of 'net culture' because you are not cultured.
>
> Too harsh words for you? I am smirking. I am just talking to you in
> the same way you talk
> to someone you haven't met personally. I believe you wouldn't dare
> to talk like this while
> sitting at the same table in one room - or if so, you are the ones
> who have sunken low ...
> Thats one of the bad things about open internet, groups and boards:
> every twit can type
> shit on his keyboard.
>
> You are using words like theft and stealing, yes even 'holly
> war' (you ment holy I guess) -
> ridiculous! Tell us - what has been stolen from you, what is gone
> forever, what has been
> damaged? Go on and specify the damage! That's in fact what you must
> do before writing
> an invoice or even going to court - otherwise the judge might just
> laugh at you.
>
> You are talking about commercial use. Go on you materialistic
> professionals - calculate
> the chance of a mass production of such a pano-screen. Name a global
> investor who
> would spend a cent!? Every public institution receives monetary
> support from the state or
> from companies - but not solely for commercial purposes. Quite a lot
> of developments are
> done for the sake of science and research, to bring knowledge and
> experience to higher
> levels by not only looking at the profit!
>
> There has been no damage neither to you or your work nor to third
> parties. PROOF only
> one case, where you have received the right to publish on WWP, but
> NOT somewhere else?!
> If it is published on WWP, it can easily be seen on Google Earth (by
> FREE downloading the
> placemarks) - what can be more public? You have no control at all,
> where and when your
> panos are seen. A rights-contract about that is futile.
>
> You are the ones who take 'different measurements', you compare
> apples and oranges.
> You should look at the 'real thing', i.e. what has happened
> effectively, then go on with
> your work and save your families from starving, you paupers.
>
> Now I feel better - I had to vent my anger about your inadequate
> aggressive behavior ...
> And hey dorks, read your own words, they don't solve any problem,
> they are just a
> squandering of bandwidth. :p
>
> (* Of course I do not mean the whole WWP group! But I am too chicken-
> hearted to name
> the handful - the right ones will know by discovering quotations)
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]