wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: discussion of the future of the WWP
Caroling Geary 2013-Feb-10 17:39:00
Hi Luca, I'm having trouble grasping your point with respect to Yahoo vs. FB vs. G+.
We do want to exclude non-members, spammers, and trolls, right?
We do want to include anyone with an interest in WWP, right?
Don't we have to have a private environment?
What is totalizing?
Are you implying that not everyone agrees on being pulled in to the same environment?
Are there any better solutions?
On Feb 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, luca vascon wrote:
> I do not personally think that G+ is better, or different from FB.
> They are both something you are "in" or "out". They do exclude. Internet,
> the whole thing is also something you can be in or out, depending on how
> and if you can access to it. But all those things are borders, you end up
> in being pulled in totalizing private environments.
>
>
> 2013/2/10 Caroling Geary ...
>>
>> Interesting to hear the polarizing effect of Facebook. For me fb is more
>> effective socializing than email or any other bulletin boards. For me
>> Facebook has enough options for privacy that I haven't found it worse than
>> all the other perils of internet usage. But I have good friends that do not
>> get it or use it. I wonder if Google + is any better for Facebook
>> objectors? I haven't figured out how to use G+ well, but would it work for
>> a group?
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:50 AM, luca vascon wrote:
>>
>>> Agree, definite no-no to facebook. I do have enough of facebook eating up
>>> the whole internet.
>>>
>>> 2013/2/10 diallery
>>>
>>>> I agree with Zorg, for me Facebook is not an option.
>>>>
>>>> --- In #removed#, "Zorg" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I will never go to Facebook, The behaviour of this company about
>> privacy
>>>> is not acceptable.