wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: discussion of the future of the WWP
Phil Marston 2013-Feb-11 08:17:00
G+ has a new communities option that seems to work quite nicely ...
On 11 Feb 2013, at 08:07, luca vascon <#removed#> wrote:
> Well, yahoo does not really require you to have yahoo mail or similar. The
> one we have now looks like a good compromise. A permeable border.
> Better solutions? Maybe, but not as cost effective as the present one. We
> could put up a site with vbullettin or similar, mails and 3ds will be in "a
> place in the web you have to go to" and not such an easy thing in the
> mailbox. But they would be better "linkable from" FB twitter g+ etc. more
> wwp and less yahoo. And could be integrated with wwp site and images.
> (easy, in words, but would require a lot of effort I think).
> Not sure it is a really viable solution, it would require a lot of energy
> and volunteering. I mean, in addiction to what is currently done by a lot
> of us. I do not know if it is feasable, but moving habits and costumes
> when things work, for putting icing on cake is not always a good idea...
>
>
>
> 2013/2/10 Caroling Geary <#removed#>
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Hi Luca, I'm having trouble grasping your point with respect to Yahoo vs.
>> FB vs. G+.
>> We do want to exclude non-members, spammers, and trolls, right?
>> We do want to include anyone with an interest in WWP, right?
>> Don't we have to have a private environment?
>> What is totalizing?
>> Are you implying that not everyone agrees on being pulled in to the same
>> environment?
>> Are there any better solutions?
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, luca vascon wrote:
>>
>>> I do not personally think that G+ is better, or different from FB.
>>> They are both something you are "in" or "out". They do exclude. Internet,
>>> the whole thing is also something you can be in or out, depending on how
>>> and if you can access to it. But all those things are borders, you end up
>>> in being pulled in totalizing private environments.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/2/10 Caroling Geary ...
>>
>>>>
>>>> Interesting to hear the polarizing effect of Facebook. For me fb is more
>>>> effective socializing than email or any other bulletin boards. For me
>>>> Facebook has enough options for privacy that I haven't found it worse
>> than
>>>> all the other perils of internet usage. But I have good friends that do
>> not
>>>> get it or use it. I wonder if Google + is any better for Facebook
>>>> objectors? I haven't figured out how to use G+ well, but would it work
>> for
>>>> a group?
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:50 AM, luca vascon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Agree, definite no-no to facebook. I do have enough of facebook eating
>> up
>>>>> the whole internet.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/2/10 diallery
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with Zorg, for me Facebook is not an option.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- In #removed#, "Zorg" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will never go to Facebook, The behaviour of this company about
>>>> privacy
>>>>>> is not acceptable.
>
>
>
> --
> Luca Vascon.
> --
> www.lucavascon.net
> Questa è la mia mail privata, la guardo di tanto in tanto.
> Se volete parlarmi di lavoro, contattatemi attraverso i siti qui sotto.
>
> www.officinepanottiche.com
> www.nuovostudio.it
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------
> The World-Wide Panorama
>
> For more information:
> -Visit the web site at http://worldwidepanorama.org
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>