wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: discussion of the future of the WWP
luca vascon 2013-Feb-11 08:07:00
Well, yahoo does not really require you to have yahoo mail or similar. The
one we have now looks like a good compromise. A permeable border.
Better solutions? Maybe, but not as cost effective as the present one. We
could put up a site with vbullettin or similar, mails and 3ds will be in "a
place in the web you have to go to" and not such an easy thing in the
mailbox. But they would be better "linkable from" FB twitter g+ etc. more
wwp and less yahoo. And could be integrated with wwp site and images.
(easy, in words, but would require a lot of effort I think).
Not sure it is a really viable solution, it would require a lot of energy
and volunteering. I mean, in addiction to what is currently done by a lot
of us. I do not know if it is feasable, but moving habits and costumes
when things work, for putting icing on cake is not always a good idea...
2013/2/10 Caroling Geary <#removed#>
> **
>
>
> Hi Luca, I'm having trouble grasping your point with respect to Yahoo vs.
> FB vs. G+.
> We do want to exclude non-members, spammers, and trolls, right?
> We do want to include anyone with an interest in WWP, right?
> Don't we have to have a private environment?
> What is totalizing?
> Are you implying that not everyone agrees on being pulled in to the same
> environment?
> Are there any better solutions?
>
> On Feb 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, luca vascon wrote:
>
> > I do not personally think that G+ is better, or different from FB.
> > They are both something you are "in" or "out". They do exclude. Internet,
> > the whole thing is also something you can be in or out, depending on how
> > and if you can access to it. But all those things are borders, you end up
> > in being pulled in totalizing private environments.
> >
> >
> > 2013/2/10 Caroling Geary ...
>
> >>
> >> Interesting to hear the polarizing effect of Facebook. For me fb is more
> >> effective socializing than email or any other bulletin boards. For me
> >> Facebook has enough options for privacy that I haven't found it worse
> than
> >> all the other perils of internet usage. But I have good friends that do
> not
> >> get it or use it. I wonder if Google + is any better for Facebook
> >> objectors? I haven't figured out how to use G+ well, but would it work
> for
> >> a group?
> >>
> >> On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:50 AM, luca vascon wrote:
> >>
> >>> Agree, definite no-no to facebook. I do have enough of facebook eating
> up
> >>> the whole internet.
> >>>
> >>> 2013/2/10 diallery
> >>>
> >>>> I agree with Zorg, for me Facebook is not an option.
> >>>>
> >>>> --- In #removed#, "Zorg" wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will never go to Facebook, The behaviour of this company about
> >> privacy
> >>>> is not acceptable.
>
>
>
--
Luca Vascon.
--
www.lucavascon.net
Questa ? la mia mail privata, la guardo di tanto in tanto.
Se volete parlarmi di lavoro, contattatemi attraverso i siti qui sotto.
www.officinepanottiche.com
www.nuovostudio.it
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]