World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:ptgroup
Date/Time:2007-Mar-10 17:46:00
Subject:Re: Hagia Sophia Virtual Tour hase been released (Turkey)

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Re: Hagia Sophia Virtual Tour hase been released (Turkey) ptgroup 2007-Mar-10 17:46:00
I was not patient enough to wait until a fullscreen "arrived".
The speed- problem is a Turkish problem.
They are not so god connected as one may assume when reading their ads.
But still there are some much faster websites in Turkey - so have a look for a better provider.

Waited for 2 hrs- no image.

Ciao
Mike


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: #removed# [mailto:#removed#]Im Auftrag von Hans
Nyberg
Gesendet: Samstag, 10. M?rz 2007 15:12
An: #removed#
Betreff: Re: Hagia Sophia Virtual Tour hase been released
(Turkey)



On Mar 10, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Y?lmaz Tufan wrote:

>
> we want to show everything with good perspective cause of then we use
> quality photos.
> and 1,5 - 2 mb file size maybe acceptable . Because in
> www.panoramas.dk site
> almost have same size for panoramas.
>
> next month we will make a new project about istanbul and we make it
> better
> than Haiga Sophia.

Your problems seem to be a bad service provider.
The site changes very much in speed from day to day.

Today the speed looks fine, but still if I check it I can see that I
only download with 50kb/sec which is half of the speed from my own
sites.
A  general speedtest from Istanbul showed the  same very slow
connection, actually even lower speed, so maybe you should get a
server place abroad.

However  I am dissapointed on the quality.
If I had the chance of doing  something like Haiga Sophia I  would go
out and rent some better  equipment if I did not already have it.

It looks like you are using a Coolpix or a Peleng 8mm  and that is
absolutelly the last lens I would use for a church with windows
flooded with bright sunlight.
You have to shoot Raw and bracket the images for a project like this.

Something else is that you are using a very small Cubeface and they
are not at all compressed to the size you could do without  quality
loss.
  800x800 is far to small even for the small size you show them in.
They are 1,5mb but they can easy be compressed to 700kb  and you can
not see any difference.

I usually use 1500 for fullscreen and that gives around 1,5-2mb

Hans

Hans Nyberg
Panoramas.dk<http://www.panoramas.dk>  Features Fullscreen QTVR from
the best VR Photographers
email:  #removed#




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------
The World-Wide Panorama

For more information:
-Visit the web site at http://GeoImages.Berkeley.edu/wwp.html
Yahoo! Groups Links



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/716 - Release Date: 09.03.2007 18:53


Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page