Mailinglist: | wwp@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | floris_dick |
Date/Time: | 2007-May-15 16:20:00 |
Subject: | Re: mixed use question by newbie |
--- In #removed#, Uri Cogan <uri@...> wrote: > > floris_dick wrote: > > > > we've been making some virtual panorama's of proposed > > realestate, this is the latest one : > > http://www.dickf.dds.nl/nierkerk/index.htm > > <http://www.dickf.dds.nl/nierkerk/index.htm> > > <http://www.dickf.dds.nl/nierkerk/index.htm > > <http://www.dickf.dds.nl/nierkerk/index.htm>> renderd in cinema4d. still > > a work in progress, what do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > I am very, very impressed. > > > > Now I have some ideas > > of mixing CG with photography for the upcoming community event but i > > don't know if that's considered accaptable, what do you think? > > > > > > > > > So far, it's perfectly acceptable. > > I also mixed a photographed QTVR panorama with a 3D scene rendered in > Bryce for the "Borders" WWP project: > > http://geoimages.berkeley.edu/worldwidepanorama/wwp306/html/UriCogan.htm... > > and mixed a panoramic scene, rendered in Bryce with some photographic, > and other images for the "Atmosphere" project: > > http://geoimages.berkeley.edu/worldwidepanorama/wwp307/html/UriCogan.htm... > > And... I found Bj?rn Nilssen's "Pano in Pano" to be quite impressive. > > Cheers. Uri. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > Great to see more people mixing it up!