wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: FullScreen max 3Mb's
Viktor Balogh 2007-Dec-25 22:58:00
Hello
I suggest to choose approximately 1600px as the cube size,
and not to sharpen the upper and lower cube faces.
Sharpening results in a much more file size,
and for example the tiny boughs of the trees don't need sharpening.
At least it is more pleasant not to sharpen everything.
And you can even choose a lower quality for the upper
and lower cube faces, so that must be under 3Mbytes.
I think skipping this event would be silly.... ;)
(But yes, screen resolutions will be higher every year.)
Best regards,
Viktor
-------------------------------------
Visit my panoramic photoblog!
http://vrphoto.hu
Spherical panoramas by Viktor Balogh
---------- Original Message -----------
From: "bw19h" <#removed#>
To: #removed#
Sent: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:06:48 -0000
Subject: Re: FullScreen max 3Mb's
> --- In #removed#, Willy Kaemena <wkaemena@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Here the monitor resolution of my last 2000 visitors
> >
> > 804 41.32% 1024x768
> > 627 32.22% 1280x1024
> > 372 19.12% Unknown
> > 83 4.27% 800x600
> > 43 2.21% 1152x864
> > 17 0.87% 1600x1200
> >
> > Willy Kaemena
>
> Yep,
> but screens are groing fast and so is resolution.
> The WWP is also a library for the future, isn't it ?
> That's my point.
>
> With my choice for "best of" I have to reduce cubes to ?1350 jpg 80% to get under the 3
> MB.
> It's a landscape in spring with a lot of trees and details.
> If I reduce the jpg compression I get banding in the sky and 1350pix cube size..... :-(
> I think I will skip that entry...
>
> >
> > http://homepage.mac.com/wkaemena/FSPanos/Menu268.html
> > http://bremen.360cities.net/
> > http://syria.360cities.net/
> > http://lisbon.360cities.net/
> >
> > On Dec 25, 2007, at 4:08, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This is a world wide site.
> > >
> > > Not everyone in the world has the same access to bandwidth.
> > > It's not just a matter of the posters, but also the viewers.
> > >
> > > Also, I would imagine that the percentage of people that have the
> > > larger
> > > sized screens AND run the screens at a resolution where they can
> > > tell the
> > > diff between a 2mb pano and a 3mb pano is still pretty small.
> > >
> > > ( it's amazing the # of people who get the larger screens and still
> > > run
> > > at lower resolutions )
> > >
> > > --On Monday, December 24, 2007 4:39 PM -0800 "#removed#"
> > > <rcfish@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It might when someone else is kind enough to provide bandwidth and
> > > > server real estate for free.
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 24, 2007, at 4:32 PM, bw19h wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Does 30% extra matters these days ?
> > > >> Storage is cheap(er) and data tranfers costs are lower every year.
> > > >>
> > > >> --- In #removed#, Markus Altendorff <panoramas_de@>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --- bw19h <frank@> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Why is the FullScreen limited to 3Mb.
> > > >> > > This is so yesterday......
> > > >> > > Any ideas ?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'll talk with Don and Landis about that. We're using
> > > >> > resources provided by the Berkeley University, so
> > > >> > we're usually a bit cautious when it comes to
> > > >> > bandwidth and storage usage and data transfer volumes.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Markus
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Jetzt Mails schnell in einem Vorschaufenster ?berfliegen. Dies
> > > >> und viel mehr bietet
> > > >> das neue Yahoo! Mail - www.yahoo.de/mail
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Robert C. Fisher
> > > > VR Photography/Cinematography
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------
> > > > The World-Wide Panorama
> > > >
> > > > For more information:
> > > > -Visit the web site at http://GeoImages.Berkeley.edu/wwp.html
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
------- End of Original Message -------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]