wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Comments
Wheaton, Simon 2007-Jan-03 09:42:00
I think it is more useful for comments to be on the page where the pano is, accessable to anyone that is viewing the pano, at the time they are viewing the pano, rather than comments being made on a mailing list that is serperate to the panos, and that is only really for contributors.
Why should WWP be restricted to only adding features that are already implemented on other VR sites?
We should have comments because contributors are asking for comments.
Simon
Canberra
AUSTRALIA
________________________________
From: #removed# on behalf of Erik Krause
Sent: Wed 3/01/2007 8:09 PM
> I agree that having a comments area for each pano would be a great
> improvement, similar to what they have on photo hosting sites like
> Flickr.
I don't know Flickr but on the german fotocommunity site you have to
be member to post comments. Do we need this? We have this list. Any
member who want's to comment can do it here.
My personal vote would be: No comments. The most popular VR sites
panoramas.dk, vrmag and arounder don't have a commenting possibility
so why should WWP have it?
best regards
--
Erik Krause
Resources, not only for panorama creation:
http://www.erik-krause.de/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]