wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Quick Time
Madeena 360 2004-Aug-25 11:56:00
On 25/8/2004 2:50 PM, "Harald Walker" <#removed#> wrote:
> Madeena 360 wrote:
>
>> > On 25/8/2004 2:01 PM, "Hans Nyberg" <#removed#> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>>> >>The Windows hijacking is not at all a problem today. It has not been since
>>> >>more than 4 years.
>>> >>It is not possible today.
>>> >>Not if you use JPG for compression and the correct active X tags.
>
>> > Has anyone tested using the .qt extension instead of the .mov? It should
>> > make it harder for Windows media player (or any other programme) to hijack
>> > QTVR.
>
> As Hans already wrote, Windows Hijack is NOT a problem any longer. .mov
> is the correct extension for Quicktime movies. Quicktime on Windows also
> notifies you in case a different programm wants to handle .mov files,
> but that is only relevant for stand alone movie files. On web-pages the
> object and embed tags instruct the browser which plug-in to use. Often I
> see web-pages, where people directly link to Quicktime movies. That is
> not the correct way.
>
> Regards,
>
> Harald
>
>
No testing is needed then :-)
Thanks
--
Madeena 360?
Digital Photos that Move You?
T: +2010.1440.168
F: +202.404.6253
W: http://www.Madeena360.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]