wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Sustenance - what does it mean?
Jakob Norstedt-Moberg 2007-Sep-04 13:57:00
--- In #removed#, Rodolpho Pajuaba <rpajuaba@...> wrote:
>
> From my point of view, this is the very beauty of the idea
of "Open
> Themes", at WWPanorama (and I?m not an english-native speaker as
well,
> I?m brazilian). You can take the meaning literally, or get the
> conotation of it, and develop an entirely new view from the theme.
If
> your take is literal, so be it, and interpret like Yuval did
(bridges,
> and the lack of sustaining); if not, take your own conotation, and
go
> for it. But this is *my* view, I hope I?m not so away from the
usual ;-) .
Rodolpho,
I agree completely. I have several times made interpretations of
the WWP themes that are quite flexible. This is why I was surprised
to find this narrow definition at the WWP page leaving no room for
other interpretations.
Jakob