World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:AYRTON
Date/Time:2008-May-27 14:34:00
Subject:Re: Phone Call from ZKM

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Re: Phone Call from ZKM AYRTON 2008-May-27 14:34:00
I agree but remember that a LOT of the panographers do not read this list
until is very close to a wwp new event ...Also, ms. petra or mr. linterman,
or anybody from their lawyers or even the geeks that work for them and that
probably are the ones who stolen our panos ARE READING THIS LIST RIGHT NOW
!!!

They probably had been here for a long time ... reading, searching,
observing, and taking notes !!!


AYRTON



On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Mark D. Fink <#removed#>
wrote:

> the best strategy now is to perpare an invoice and send it to them. then
> contact them and negotiate between that invoice (our extreme condition)
> and their current position, and see where the negotiations lead before
> making any noise or irreversible act of war.
>
> Yuv
>
> Yuv,
>
> Good point! So, if we take the total number of VR's that have been produced
> during the period that they misappropriated, then multiply that by the
> reasonable charges for theft and copyright infringement, we would arrive at
> our "extreme condition". Then, whatever the settlement turns out to be,
> would it make sense to divide that by the total number of VR's, and then
> each artist would get that amount for each VR they produced during the
> period in question? Therefore, the more VR's you produced, the more of the
> settlement you would get. Then, each of us could decide individually if we
> want to donate some or all of that back to the WWP. Maybe we could use it
> for taking the WWP off of the Berkley servers, or covering some of the time
> that Landis et al have put into the effort all these years. Personally, I'd
> like to see some of whatever the settlement turns out to be going back to
> the WWP in some form.
>
> Should we set up a way to gather who wants to be included in this
> collective
> invoice? Let's not assume that everyone wants to be included. Maybe it
> could
> be in the form of an email to the list where the subject is either "ZKM
> YES"
> (to be included in the collective invoice) or "ZKM NO" (to be excluded from
> the collective invoice)? Either that, or a poll where the ID of the voter
> is
> recorded. That would save massive amounts of emails coming to this account.
>
> Mark
> www.nyc.360cities.net <http://www.nyc.360cities.net/>
> www.pinnacle-vr.com <http://www.pinnacle-vr.com/>
> www.northernlight.net <http://www.northernlight.net/>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------
> The World-Wide Panorama
>
> For more information:
> -Visit the web site at http://GeoImages.Berkeley.edu/wwp.htmlYahoo! Groups
> Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
------------
| A Y R |
| T O N |
------------

+ 55 21 9982 6313

http://ayrton360.com
http://rio.360cities.net
http://vrfolio.com
http://ayrton.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page