wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: quo vadis WWP?
Sam Rohn 2013-Feb-16 05:01:00
hey guys
i didn't mean to say that tech conversations about WWP should be moved to facebook, just that fb offers a better platform to interact with a larger audience, i assume the WWP dev team will use whatever they like best for internal and member communications
i also meant that WWP was "social" in that it is an open collaborative project, and that sites like facebook which already have a large number of potential contributors and viewers who can be easily targeted might be of interest to the organizers of this project, not that WWP should become some sort of socializing site itself
as far as comments etc, i am neutral on that, not every site needs them, but i am happy to offer advice on implementation of such things if needed
sam
- - - - -
Sam Rohn :: New York City
Panoramic Photography :: http://www.samrohn.com
Location Scout :: http://www.nylocations.com
--- In #removed#, "bryant_arnett" <mail3@...> wrote:
>
> The way I see it, the WWP is NOT a "social project."
>
--- In #removed#, "Wheaton, Simon" <simon.wheaton@...> wrote:
>
> "...it seems to me that for a social project like WWP and its members to ignore facebook and other social websites in the year 2013 is just ridiculous and counterproductive..."
>
> Moving a technical discussion email list onto Facebook is just ridiculous and counterproductive.
>
> I see absolutely no point to moving this discussion list onto Facebook, if that is what is being discussed here, it is simply not appropriate.
>
> Promoting the WWP on Facebook to the general public is, and should be, completely separate to the technical discussion that takes place here.
>
> What is the problem with the Yahoo group as it is, and why the desire to move to another group/list platform, or Facebook?
>
> Simon
> Canberra
> AUSTRALIA
>