wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: quo vadis WWP?
Bostjan Burger 2013-Feb-17 12:31:00
Sorry for the typo ... I shouldn't type on that "glass" anymore ;)
"Or there can be FB icon only to the existed FB profile of the panographer. The info about FB (or G+, suggestions...) can be add by each participant when the pre. server is open. (?)"
Bo?tjan
________________________________
From: Bostjan Burger <#removed#>
To: "#removed#" <#removed#>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: quo vadis WWP?
Or there can be FB icon only to the existed FB profile of the panographer. The info about FB (or G+, suggestions...)cand be add buy each participant when the pre. server is open. (?)
Bo?tjan
________________________________
From: Keith Martin #removed#>
To: "#removed#" #removed#>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: quo vadis WWP?
When considering options it can be useful to look at the pros and cons of the different things. It isn't a vote for or against doing those things, and it's not important, initially, to get into details. It's a way to list possible good and bad points so they can be considered clearly.
Like buttons
Pros:
(1) ultra-low-friction method of someone promoting a page to their FB friends
Cons:
(1) If 'like count' is shown it could become a defacto voting system. Avoidable.
Share buttons
Pros:
(1) More visible method of someone promoting a page to their FB friends
Cons:
(1) as with likes: visible counts could be seen as votes.
Comments
Pros:
(1) provides WWP participants with feedback that's not reliant on mailing list participation
Cons:
(1) could be a distraction to the primary content
(2) could be used for flames or spam
Does anyone want to add to these?
k
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]