wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: Publishing to QTVR on Windows platform ... suggestions?
mposehn 2004-Mar-26 14:57:00
Victor,
I'm in the same situation. I downloaded PanoCube and got the same
result - a serviceable QTVR, but not as sharp as I would like. There
must be a better way.
Mike
--- In #removed#, "Victor" <#removed#> wrote:
> I'm being driven to distraction by this! Though I've fooled around
> with panos for some time now, my output has almost exclusively been
> for print ... partial cylindricals or mosaics for higher res, that
> sort of thing.
>
> I've got a decent image stitched together, but my attempts at
> getting it into QTVR have been dissappointing.
>
> I'm aware of PanoCube ... that's what I've been using at the
moment,
> though I'm definitely open to other suggestions! I'd be happy to
> pay for a full version of PanoCube, it's certainly not expensive,
if
> that would solve the problems.
>
> Essentially, I've been seeing some wonderfully detailed, crisp
> looking panos here (and elsewhere) that weigh in a couple megabytes
> in size ... 2Mb or less. Anything I'm producing at that size looks
> blurry and undetailed, definitely NOT like the original image. In
> order to even approach the quality of the original, I'm pushing 4Mb
> in size. There's got to be a trick I'm not clued in to here, so
I'm
> asking for advice, pointers towards resources I can bone up on,
> etc.. Are most (or many) of you using Macs to publish to QTVR?
> There seems to be a lot more resources available for that
platform.
> I've got access to Linux, and I believe there's a Mac emulator I
> could run, but not for OSX if that's required.
>
> Anyhow, thanks in advance ...
>
> Victor