World Wide Panorama mailing list archive

Mailinglist:wwp@yahoogroups.com
Sender:Fernando Costa Pinto
Date/Time:2008-Jun-05 21:35:00
Subject:Re: ZKM globorama hassle

Thread:


wwp@yahoogroups.com: Re: ZKM globorama hassle Fernando Costa Pinto 2008-Jun-05 21:35:00
Josh ,
Should you take your eyes from your navel ? A bit ? from time to time ?at
least ?
Who payed you a beer to come here making me laught ?

ZKM hit the stick ...they hit hard ,  dot


Fernando

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Josh <#removed#> wrote:

>   --- In #removed# <wwp%40yahoogroups.com>, "Reinhard Schmolze"
> <schmolze@...> wrote:
> >
> > I believe that Josh in this case is maybe a bit biased.
> >
> > He lives in Stuttgart, and in Stuttgart's largest daily paper were
> published several articles on
> > him and his work, including a full page feature. I don't read
> Stuttgart's papers,so I don't
> > know how well known he is there. (The clippings which I have seen a
> friend from Stuttgart
> > had sent to me.)
> >
> > But since the Globorama was also shown on the fair "Ideenpark" in
> Stuttgart, maybe Josh
> > feels that it is an advantage for him and some kind of advertising
> if his name appears a few
> > times on the big screen there.
> >
> > Reinhard
> >
>
> Oh come on now - what is this - a campaign against me and my work?
>
> Reinhard, it was you who told me about the case on May 29. Otherwise I
> would not even be aware of it, cause I haven't visited the Ideenpark fair.
>
> The globorama screen showed all the names (not only mine), why should
> it be an advantage for me? Because I live here? Strange conclusion. Do
> you really believe, the viewers stand there open-mouthed staring at
> the names of photographers instead of enjoying the pictures?
>
> I accept, that my opinion is not shared by the ones who answered my
> post. But my opinion is definately not biased.
>
> I have seen the screen in Karlsruhe some months ago, when it displayed
> a heli-flight over some mountains. A 360-degree-film, great stuff that
> was. Since then I thought it is a great development, building such a
> screen. And I still think, it is great for displaying panos. Does this
> bias me?
>
> I am sure, every wwp panographer has some fame in his hometown region
> or is at least working on it, thats just normal.
>
> Since 4 years I am building up a collection of now nearly 400
> roundshots, published as QTVR on my website. The tourist information
> site links to my panos, the city hall has purchased a 640 cm wide
> print, etc. That's my work and my effort! Why should the local
> newspaper not write about it? Btw are these facts no secrets,
> everybody can read it on my homepage.
>
> Please come down to earth. Yes, I am a fan of the globorama
> development, but I am not your enenmy!
>
> Cheers
> Josh
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page