wwp@yahoogroups.com:
Re: jpeg to flash quality issues???
AYRTON 2009-Jun-26 14:47:00
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Dave 360texas.com <#removed#>wrote:
> I guess my last comment would be - why not just let upload a 1.5 to 2.0 mb
> single standalone flash .swf ?
Dave,
I think the answer is because not everyone likes, use or own p2vr !!!
Most of the guys prefer to not use a swf file, that's what I see in the
forums and lists everywhere.
And the JPEG makes it easier for ALL, even amateurs, to be present on WWP
just submiting a bitmap file that is easy to make.
And besides that PANOSALADO is a very good player,
in my personnal opinion, much beter than the results from p2vr
best regards
AYRTON
Why does WWP need go through all the conversion issues?
>
> /s/
> Dave still at 360Texas.com
>
> --- In #removed#, caroling@... wrote:
> >
> > Comments following your text.
> >
> > --
> > Caroling, www.wholeo.net
> >
> > -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: Yahoo Account <panoramas_de@...>
> > >
> > > if you
> > don't want to bother with the "beta" flash support just yet (or not at
> all),
> > then feel free to use Quicktime like during the events before and simply
> > disregard the "jpeg upload" part.
> >
> > Comment:
> > If the equirect is optional, and an entry might not have a Flash version,
> then the experience for those who "Prefer Flash", will be incomplete. How
> will it work when the Flash preference is set but there's no Flash version.
> A message like "No Flash version"? Then I have to click "Back" to make
> another try? Maybe if you say "Prefer Flash (Beta)" it will help. Or are you
> converting all QTs to Flash?
> >
> > Re: the "set top/bottom limit" - it's only helpful for partial spheres
> ,,,
> > For cylinders, ...
> > However, for cylindrical panoramas with large vertical field of view,
> >
> > Comment:
> > If all of them are equirectangles, I do not see the difference between
> these. Isn't a cylinder a partial sphere? And the set limits are there for
> what I call a cylinder, so how do I know that it isn't important?
> >
> > >
> > > One thing high on my list is to teach Internet Explorer to reveal
> >
> > Comment:
> > I have sympathy for you. This changing of formats is a huge job with
> myriad pesky time-consuming details. I appreciate the brave bold move
> because without it, WWP would die. But it is not easy at all.
> >
> > > Once this works, I can turn the "Prefer Flash/Prefer Quicktime" link
> ...have the browser decide
> >
> > Comment:
> > Not sure about this. Personally, I like the firm view of my preference.
> It might be my imagination, but it seems to me that QT panos usually flow
> more smoothly. When I come to one that I like to spin in, I might switch
> back and forth between QT and Flash.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------
> The World-Wide Panorama
>
> For more information:
> -Visit the web site at http://worldwidepanorama.org
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
------------
| A Y R |
| T O N |
------------ + 55 21 9982 6313
http://ayrton360.com | http://vrfolio.com | http://ayrton.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]