wwp@yahoogroups.com:
RE: how about moving away from quicktime?
John Spikowski 2006-Oct-18 19:35:00
> Hello,
> I really don?t want to go to deep into that discussion - it?s
> done for too many times now.
> We just build up some sites with speric panos and still are
> not sure what the final solution could be.
> Personally I like Immervision - but the quality of a small
> Quicktime is much better imo.
> Also it is easier to handle: all stuff can be done by an
> "droplet" of Pano2QTVR and that?s it.
> The capability to inklude MP3?s ia just great - did this for
> a website of a music group.
> JAVA only handles au- format which is by far worse.
>
> Staying with QT isn?t the worst decision at all.
> Changing to whatever:
> what to do with the old panos ?
> how much work to get a template up and running stable ?
> is there really a sigificant increase in : a) quality /
> convienience / features ?
> b) audience ?
>
> Yes - forcing users to download the hole bunch of itunes
> etc. just for them to use Quicktime is an issue but as far as
> I kno: you still can get ONLY Quicktime somewhere to download
> at Apples website (???)
>
> What do the organisators say about that ?
>
> Ciao
> Mike
Maybe there will be some relief from the FreePV QT compatible viewer
project.
John